![]() You must choose reality over delusionĪs a signal of this commitment, you must pledge to follow the 12 steps to full recovery. In short, you must make the decision to think for yourself and not swallow the filtered information of the Sierra Club executive or rely upon CBC Pravda for the facts. You must finally grasp that smart growth is dumb. More efficient use of scarce resources allows for and promotes more growth. By making things more efficient, new technology makes them cheaper, and therefore provokes even more consumption than before. And you must accept that there are no miracle technological solutions to what is essentially a moral problem-the need to stabilize and reduce our population level. You must acknowledge that would be pointless for a society to cut its per capita consumption in half only to turn around and double the population. Change is possible.īut first you must admit to yourself that numbers matter, that it is not just about per capita consumption but the sum total of “capitas”. Just when you were about to give up all hope of understanding why things are going to hell, SCA will come to your rescue. If they are not immediately at your door they will be at the other end of telephone to guide your through you the darkness of despair back to a comprehensive understanding of the causes of environmental damage. At any time of day or night, at your weakest moment, when you feel that you must forfeit your new found courage and return to the soft but suffocating bosom of an environmental NGO and surrender your mind to Sierra Group Think-members of Sierra Clubbers Anonymous will be there for you to steady your faltering willpower and keep you to the path of redemption. With their help, together you can locate that strength, that power that exists beyond yourself that you can draw on to effect and repair the damage you have done by your denial. Other soft greens have also lost their way and lost their wits too. Where do you turn to? Whom do you turn to?įriend, Sierra Clubbers Anonymous (SCA) is there for you. You are ready to change but you just can’t find the strength within yourself to make it happen. You suddenly came to realize that your escapism and self-indulgent quest to feel good about yourself by making token “green” consumer choices only promoted more growth, and that growth of any kind was harmful. Until one day you woke in the gutter without a brain and without integrity, without everything that made you an intellectually independent being. You could only think about one thing, “over-consumption”, or another, “green technology”. But then you fell off the wagon, and in deference to political correctness you discreetly dropped the “P” and refused to acknowledge that population growth, and particularly immigrant-driven population growth was a key variable of environmental degradation. ![]() That is, you accepted the fact that environmental impact (I) equalled the population level (P) times per capita consumption (A) times technology (T). You regarded the “IPAT” equation as axiomatic. Once when you had control of your life you were an authentic environmentalist. Realizing that you are in trouble and are powerless to get out of it without assistance is the first step to recovery. You finally hit rock bottom-and you just can’t seem to summon the stamina to climb out. We need MPs who will put Canadians first.Ī 12-Step Program for Recovering Population-Deniers and Green Growth-Managers A curse on them and all like them in whatever party. All these open-borders champions-Chow, May, Trudeau and Kenny deserve to be turfed from the public trough and returned to the hole that they sprung from. I am an equal oppportunity quisling-hater. The Liberal candidate who has the best chance of unseating ethnic-ass-kisser Immigration, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenny. The Bloc candidate who has the best chance of defeating Liberal immigration critic Justin Trudeau. The Conservative incumbent Gary Lunn, who has the best chance of defeating challenger Elizabeth May of the Green Party. The (Liberal) candidate who has a chance to defeat the NDP Immigration critic, Olivia Chow. Therefore I would send money to the following campaigns: ![]() And if I cannot cast a vote against someone in another riding, I can always lend financial support to the candidate best positioned to defeat the worst candidate. But as Churchill said, while there may not be anyone worth voting for, there is always someone worth voting against. There is no candidate in my constituency worthy of my vote. All have one agenda-massive and unending immigration-driven population growth. I have no preference for any of the five main parties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |